diff options
| author | Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2017-09-27 14:34:38 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2017-11-14 15:59:00 +0100 |
| commit | c955dbd7fe67df576667d03f2cd58ff06334524e (patch) | |
| tree | 01c41d3c02b8fc2c739c27280b62205045640012 | |
| parent | c1be8557658055746e68278fe5a904b627a9d091 (diff) | |
btrfs-progs: check: error or return value of repair_root_items()
Return value of repair_root_items():
<0 on error
=0 does nothing
>0 if repair is enabled, N roots are repaired;
else N roots are corrupted.
In the repair mode, there should be no error if the return value is
bigger than 0. This fixes the test fsck/006 again.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | cmds-check.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c index a5cd1b1e..4528b932 100644 --- a/cmds-check.c +++ b/cmds-check.c @@ -14813,8 +14813,8 @@ int cmd_check(int argc, char **argv) if (!init_extent_tree) { ret = repair_root_items(info); - err |= !!ret; if (ret < 0) { + err = !!ret; error("failed to repair root items: %s", strerror(-ret)); goto close_out; } |