summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>2017-05-31 13:56:09 +0800
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2017-07-03 13:35:11 +0200
commitd39731a53bb6212effc184719296e39f5200ee94 (patch)
tree42a914a6904fc4d3ee947c624713026bf87b734d
parent6e7b1bbdecfa89d4bd3b51e56d01b29274fe3902 (diff)
btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix false alert on missing chunk or dev extent
When checking chunk or dev extent, lowmem mode uses chunk length as dev extent length, and if they mismatch, report missing chunk or dev extent like: ------ ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 0 did not find the related dev extent ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 1 did not find the related dev extent ERROR: chunk[256 4324327424) stripe 2 did not find the related dev extent ------ However, only for Single/DUP/RAID1 profiles chunk length is the same as dev extent length. For other profiles, this will cause tons of false alert. Fix it by using correct stripe length when checking chunk and dev extent items. This fixes the mkfs test failure when using lowmem mode check. Reported-by: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-rw-r--r--cmds-check.c11
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index de9f2709..f6200c08 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -10923,7 +10923,12 @@ static int check_dev_extent_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
l = path.nodes[0];
chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(l, path.slots[0], struct btrfs_chunk);
- if (btrfs_chunk_length(l, chunk) != length)
+ ret = btrfs_check_chunk_valid(chunk_root, l, chunk, path.slots[0],
+ chunk_key.offset);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (btrfs_stripe_length(fs_info, l, chunk) != length)
goto out;
num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(l, chunk);
@@ -11163,6 +11168,7 @@ static int check_chunk_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_dev_extent *ptr;
u64 length;
u64 chunk_end;
+ u64 stripe_len;
u64 type;
int num_stripes;
u64 offset;
@@ -11212,6 +11218,7 @@ static int check_chunk_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
}
num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(eb, chunk);
+ stripe_len = btrfs_stripe_length(fs_info, eb, chunk);
for (i = 0; i < num_stripes; i++) {
btrfs_release_path(&path);
btrfs_init_path(&path);
@@ -11231,7 +11238,7 @@ static int check_chunk_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
offset = btrfs_dev_extent_chunk_offset(leaf, ptr);
if (objectid != chunk_key.objectid ||
offset != chunk_key.offset ||
- btrfs_dev_extent_length(leaf, ptr) != length)
+ btrfs_dev_extent_length(leaf, ptr) != stripe_len)
goto not_match_dev;
continue;
not_match_dev: