summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
...
* Btrfs-progs: test images for new btrfsck functionalityJosef Bacik2014-11-14
| | | | | | | These test the recreating of missing dir item/dir index pairs, fixing the no rootdir inode item and no inode item for normal files. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
* btrfs-progs: run fsck image tests in filename orderDavid Sterba2014-10-17
| | | | Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* Btrfs-progs: check, ability to detect and fix outdated snapshot root itemsFilipe Manana2014-10-17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This change adds code to detect and fix the issue introduced in the kernel release 3.17, where creation of read-only snapshots lead to a corrupted filesystem if they were created at a moment when the source subvolume/snapshot had orphan items. The issue was that the on-disk root items became incorrect, referring to the pre orphan cleanup root node instead of the post orphan cleanup root node. A test filesystem can be generated with the test case recently submitted for xfstests/fstests, which is essencially the following (bash script): workout() { ops=$1 procs=$2 num_snapshots=$3 _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount snapshot_cmd="$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT" snapshot_cmd="$snapshot_cmd $SCRATCH_MNT/snap_\`date +'%H_%M_%S_%N'\`" run_check $FSSTRESS_PROG -p $procs \ -x "$snapshot_cmd" -X $num_snapshots -d $SCRATCH_MNT -n $ops } ops=10000 procs=4 snapshots=500 workout $ops $procs $snapshots Example of btrfsck's (btrfs check) behaviour against such filesystem: $ btrfsck /dev/loop0 root item for root 311, current bytenr 44630016, current gen 60, current level 1, new bytenr 44957696, new gen 61, new level 1 root item for root 1480, current bytenr 1003569152, current gen 1271, current level 1, new bytenr 1004175360, new gen 1272, new level 1 root item for root 1509, current bytenr 1037434880, current gen 1300, current level 1, new bytenr 1038467072, new gen 1301, new level 1 root item for root 1562, current bytenr 33636352, current gen 1354, current level 1, new bytenr 34455552, new gen 1355, new level 1 root item for root 3094, current bytenr 1011712000, current gen 2935, current level 1, new bytenr 1008484352, new gen 2936, new level 1 root item for root 3716, current bytenr 80805888, current gen 3578, current level 1, new bytenr 73515008, new gen 3579, new level 1 root item for root 4085, current bytenr 714031104, current gen 3958, current level 1, new bytenr 716816384, new gen 3959, new level 1 Found 7 roots with an outdated root item. Please run a filesystem check with the option --repair to fix them. $ echo $? 1 $ btrfsck --repair /dev/loop0 enabling repair mode fixing root item for root 311, current bytenr 44630016, current gen 60, current level 1, new bytenr 44957696, new gen 61, new level 1 fixing root item for root 1480, current bytenr 1003569152, current gen 1271, current level 1, new bytenr 1004175360, new gen 1272, new level 1 fixing root item for root 1509, current bytenr 1037434880, current gen 1300, current level 1, new bytenr 1038467072, new gen 1301, new level 1 fixing root item for root 1562, current bytenr 33636352, current gen 1354, current level 1, new bytenr 34455552, new gen 1355, new level 1 fixing root item for root 3094, current bytenr 1011712000, current gen 2935, current level 1, new bytenr 1008484352, new gen 2936, new level 1 fixing root item for root 3716, current bytenr 80805888, current gen 3578, current level 1, new bytenr 73515008, new gen 3579, new level 1 fixing root item for root 4085, current bytenr 714031104, current gen 3958, current level 1, new bytenr 716816384, new gen 3959, new level 1 Fixed 7 roots. Checking filesystem on /dev/loop0 UUID: 2186e9b9-c977-4a35-9c7b-69c6609d4620 checking extents checking free space cache cache and super generation don't match, space cache will be invalidated checking fs roots checking csums checking root refs found 618537000 bytes used err is 0 total csum bytes: 130824 total tree bytes: 601620480 total fs tree bytes: 580288512 total extent tree bytes: 18464768 btree space waste bytes: 136939144 file data blocks allocated: 34150318080 referenced 27815415808 Btrfs v3.17-rc3-2-gbbe1dd8 $ echo $? 0 Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* btrfs-progs: make fsck deal with bogus itemsJosef Bacik2014-10-14
| | | | | | | | | | We can deal with corrupt items by deleting them in a few cases. Fsck can easily recover from a missing extent item or a dir index item. So if we notice a item is completely bogus and it is of a key that we know we can repair then just delete it and carry on. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* btrfs-progs: add the ability to fix shifted item offsetsJosef Bacik2014-10-14
| | | | | | | | | | | A user had a corrupted fs where the items had been shifted improperly. This patch adds the ability to fix this sort of problem within fsck. We will simply shift the item over to the proper offset and update the offsets to make sure they are correct. I tested this with a hand crafted fs that was broken in the same way as the user, and I've included the file as a new test. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* Btrfs-progs: repair missing dir indexJosef Bacik2014-10-13
| | | | | | | | | | | If we have an inode backref entry then we know enough to add back a missing dir index. When messing with the inode backrefs we need to do all of that first before we process the inode recs themselves as we may clear errors on the inode recs as we fix the directory indexes. This adds the framework for fixing backref errors and fixes missing dir index issues. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* btrfs-progs: skip extent rebuild test if no testdevJosef Bacik2014-10-10
| | | | | | | | | It is highly obnoxious to have to go put in a testdev when all you really want is to run the quick image tests. Make this part optional so if we don't have a testdev specified we just don't run that particular test. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* Btrfs-progs: fsck: add tests for extent tree rebuildingWang Shilong2014-08-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | We need test to verify extent tree rebuilding work, this test create a strange filesystem with some snapshots, destroy extent root node, and run fsck with "--init-extent-tree". Since this tests need btrfs internal tool(btrfs-corrupt-block),so i add this test into btrfs-progs. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* btrfs-progs: Use sparse files for filesystem conversion testsAdam Buchbinder2014-08-22
| | | | | | | | | | On my system, this brings the FS conversion test suite's runtime from over ten seconds down to under two. Thanks to Julien Muchembled for the suggestion. Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* btrfs-progs: Add some simple end-to-end tests for btrfs-convertAdam Buchbinder2014-08-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | These use the system's mke2fs, and don't require loop devices or root privileges. They don't pick up anything with the default flags right now, but they do pick up some sanitizer issues when the tools are compiled with any of -fsanitize={address,memory,thread}. Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <abuchbinder@google.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
* Btrfs-progs: add a test image for the transid fixer in btrfsckJosef Bacik2013-10-16
| | | | | | | | | | This is a verification test for the transid recow functionality of btrfsck. I've also adjusted the test script to spit out which image it's testing so I can be sure the image was getting tested. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
* Btrfs-progs: add make test frameworkJosef Bacik2013-10-16
We need to start adding some sanity tests to btrfs-progs to make sure we aren't breaking things with our patches. The most important of these tools is btrfsck. This patch gets things started by adding a basic btrfsck test that makes sure we can fix a corruption problem we know we can fix. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>