|author||Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2018-06-17 23:22:23 +0100|
|committer||Ian Jackson <email@example.com>||2018-06-17 23:22:24 +0100|
git-debrebase: Rename new-upstream-v0 command to new-upstream
This UI is pretty good now, I think, for single-piece upstreams. For multi-piece ones, which are quite tricky anyway, it is tolerable, and we it doesn't steal much of the available syntax space. So we don't need the -v0 any more. Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'NOTES.git-debrebase')
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/NOTES.git-debrebase b/NOTES.git-debrebase
index f32cf87..f87718b 100644
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ workflow
# * Workflow is currently clumsy. Lots of spurious runes to type.
# There's not even a guide.
-# * new-upstream-v0 has a terrible UI for multiple upstream pieces.
+# * new-upstream has an awkward UI for multiple upstream pieces.
# You end up with giant runic command lines. Does this matter /
# One consequence of the lack of richness it can need -f in
# fairly sensible situations.