.TH dgit 7 "" "Debian Project" "dgit"
dgit \- principles of operation
treats the Debian archive as a version control system, and
bidirectionally gateways between the archive and git. The git view of
the package can contain the usual upstream git history, and will be
augmented by commits representing uploads done by other developers not
using dgit. This git history is stored in a canonical location known
which lives on a dedicated git server.
git branches suitable for use with dgit
can be edited directly in git,
and used directly for building binary packages.
They can be shared using all conventional means for sharing git
It is not necessary to use dgit to work with dgitish git branches.
However, dgit is (usually) needed in order to convert to or from
Debian-format source packages.
.SH SEE ALSO
Reference manual and documentation catalogue.
Tutorials and workflow guides. See dgit(1) for a list.
You may use any suitable git workflow with dgit, provided you
satisfy dgit's requirements:
dgit maintains a pseudo-remote called
.BR dgit ,
with one branch per suite. This remote cannot be used with
repository for each package contains one ref per suite named
\fBrefs/dgit/\fR\fIsuite\fR. These should be pushed to only by
dgit. They are fast forwarding. Each push on this branch
corresponds to an upload (or attempted upload).
However, it is perfectly fine to have other branches in dgit-repos;
normally the dgit-repos repo for the package will be accessible via
the remote name `origin'.
dgit push will also make signed tags called
.BI archive/debian/ version
(with version encoded a la DEP-14)
and push them to dgit-repos. These are used at the
server to authenticate pushes.
Uploads made by dgit contain an additional field
in the source package .dsc. (This is added by dgit push.)
This specifies a commit (an ancestor of the dgit/suite
branch) whose tree is identical to the unpacked source upload.
Uploads not made by dgit are represented in git by commits which are
synthesised by dgit. The tree of each such commit corresponds to the
unpacked source; there is a
commit with the contents,
pseudo-merge from last known upload - that is, from the contents of
the dgit/suite branch.
Depending on the source package format,
the contents commit may have a more complex structure,
but ultimately it will be a convergence of stubby branches
from origin commits representing the components of the source package.
dgit expects trees that it works with to have a
(pseudo) remote. This refers to the dgit-created git view of
the corresponding archive.
The dgit archive tracking view is synthesised locally,
by each copy of dgit.
The tracking view is always a descendant of the
dgit-repos suite branch (if one exists),
but may be ahead of it if uploads have been done without dgit.
The archive tracking view is always fast forwarding within
dgit push can operate on any commit which is a descendant of
the suite tracking branch.
dgit does not make a systematic record of
its imports of orig tarball(s).
So it does not work by finding git tags or branches
referring to orig tarball(s).
orig tarballs are downloaded (by dgit clone) into the parent
directory, as with a traditional (non-gitish) dpkg-source workflow.
You need to retain these tarballs in the parent directory for dgit
build and dgit push.
(They are not needed for purely-git-based workflows.)
dgit repositories could be cloned with standard (git) methods.
the dgit repositories do not contain uploads not made with dgit.
for sourceful builds / uploads the orig
tarball(s) will need to be present in the parent directory.
To a user looking at the archive, changes pushed
in a simple NMU
using dgit look like
changes made in an NMU: in a `3.0 (quilt)' package the delta from the
previous upload is recorded in new patch(es) constructed by dpkg-source.
Because the synthesis
of the suite tracking branches
is done locally based only on the current archive state,
it will not necessarily see every upload
not done with dgit.
Also, different versions of dgit
(or the software it calls)
might import the same .dscs differently
(although we try to minimise this).
As a consequence, the dgit tracking views of the same
suite, made by different instances of dgit, may vary.
They will have the same contents, but may have different history.
There is no uniform linkage between the tracking branches for
The Debian infrastructure
does not do any automatic import of uploads made without dgit.
It would be possible for a distro's infrastructure to do this;
in that case,
different dgit client instances
would see exactly the same history.
There has been no bulk import of historical uploads into
Debian's dgit infrastructure.
To do this it would be necessary to decide whether to
import existing vcs history
(which might not be faithful to dgit's invariants)
or previous non-Dgit uploads
(which would not provide a very rich history).
.SH READ-ONLY DISTROS
Distros which do not maintain a set of dgit history git repositories
can still be used in a read-only mode with dgit. Currently Ubuntu
is configured this way.
.SH PACKAGE SOURCE FORMATS
If you are not the maintainer, you do not need to worry about the
source format of the package. You can just make changes as you like
in git. If the package is a `3.0 (quilt)' package, the patch stack
will usually not be represented in the git history.
.SH FORMAT 3.0 (QUILT)
For a format `3.0 (quilt)' source package, dgit may have to make a
commit on your current branch to contain metadata used by quilt and
This is because `3.0 (quilt)' source format represents the patch stack
as files in debian/patches/ actually inside the source tree. This
means that, taking the whole tree (as seen by git or ls) (i)
dpkg-source cannot represent certain trees, and (ii) packing up a tree
in `3.0 (quilt)' and then unpacking it does not always yield the same
dgit will automatically work around this for you when building and
pushing. The only thing you need to know is that dgit build, sbuild,
etc., may make new commits on your HEAD. If you're not a quilt user
this commit won't contain any changes to files you care about.
You can explicitly request that dgit do just this fixup, by running
If you are a quilt user you need to know that dgit's git trees are
`patches applied packaging branches' and do not contain the .pc
directory (which is used by quilt to record which patches are
applied). If you want to manipulate the patch stack you probably want
to be looking at tools like git-dpm.
.SH SPLIT VIEW QUILT MODE
When working with git branches intended
for use with the `3.0 (quilt)' source format
dgit can automatically convert a suitable
maintainer-provided git branch
(in one of a variety of formats)
into a dgit branch.
When a split view mode is engaged
dgit build commands and
will, on each invocation,
convert the user's HEAD into the dgit view,
so that it can be built and/or uploaded.
dgit push in split view mode will push the dgit view to the dgit
The dgit view is always a descendant of the maintainer view.
dgit push will also make a maintainer view tag
according to DEP-14
and push that to the dgit git server.
Split view mode must be enabled explicitly
(by the use of the applicable command line options,
subcommands, or configuration).
This is because it is not possible to reliably tell
whether a git tree for a dpkg-source `3.0 (quilt)' package
is a patches-applied or patches-unapplied tree.
Split view conversions are cached in the ref
This should not be manipulated directly.
.SH FILES IN THE SOURCE PACKAGE BUT NOT IN GIT - AUTOTOOLS ETC.
This section is mainly of interest to maintainers who want to use dgit
with their existing git history for the Debian package.
Some developers like to have an extra-clean git tree which lacks files
which are normally found in source tarballs and therefore in Debian
source packages. For example, it is conventional to ship ./configure
in the source tarball, but some people prefer not to have it present
in the git view of their project.
dgit requires that the source package unpacks to exactly the same
files as are in the git commit on which dgit push operates. So if you
just try to dgit push directly from one of these extra-clean git
branches, it will fail.
As the maintainer you therefore have the following options:
Persuade upstream that the source code in their git history and the
source they ship as tarballs should be identical. Of course simply
removing the files from the tarball may make the tarball hard for
people to use.
One answer is to commit the (maybe autogenerated)
files, perhaps with some simple automation to deal with conflicts and
spurious changes. This has the advantage that someone who clones
the git repository finds the program just as easy to build as someone
who uses the tarball.
Have separate git branches which do contain the extra files, and after
regenerating the extra files (whenever you would have to anyway),
commit the result onto those branches.
Provide source packages which lack the files you don't want
in git, and arrange for your package build to create them as needed.
This may mean not using upstream source tarballs and makes the Debian
source package less useful for people without Debian build
Of course it may also be that the differences are due to build system
bugs, which cause unintended files to end up in the source package.
dgit will notice this and complain. You may have to fix these bugs
before you can unify your existing git history with dgit's.
.SH FILES IN THE SOURCE PACKAGE BUT NOT IN GIT - DOCS, BINARIES ETC.
Some upstream tarballs contain build artifacts which upstream expects
some users not to want to rebuild (or indeed to find hard to rebuild),
but which in Debian we always rebuild.
Examples sometimes include crossbuild firmware binaries and
To avoid problems when building updated source
(in particular, to avoid trying to represent as changes in
the source package uninteresting or perhaps unrepresentable changes
to such files)
many maintainers arrange for the package clean target
to delete these files.
dpkg-source does not
(with any of the commonly used source formats)
represent deletion of files (outside debian/) present in upstream.
Thus deleting such files in a dpkg-source working tree does not
actually result in them being deleted from the source package.
deleting the files in rules clean sweeps this problem under the rug.
However, git does always properly record file deletion.
principle is that the dgit git tree is the same of dpkg-source -x,
that means that a dgit-compatible git tree always contains these
For the non-maintainer,
this can be observed in the following suboptimal occurrences:
The package clean target often deletes these files, making the git
tree dirty trying to build the source package, etc.
This can be fixed
.BR "dgit -wg" " aka " "--clean=git" ,
so that the package clean target is never run.
The package build modifies these files, so that builds make the git
This can be worked around by using `git reset --hard'
after each build
(or at least before each commit or push).
From the maintainer's point of view,
the main consequence is that to make a dgit-compatible git branch
it is necessary to commit these files to git.
The maintainer has a few additional options for mitigation:
it may be possible for the rules file to arrange to do the
build in a temporary area, which avoids updating the troublesome
they can then be left in the git tree without seeing trouble.
.SH PROBLEMS WITH PACKAGE CLEAN TARGETS ETC.
A related problem is other unexpected behaviour by a package's
If a package's rules
modify files which are distributed in the package,
or simply forget to remove certain files,
dgit will complain that the tree is dirty.
Again, the solution is to use
.BR "dgit -wg" " aka " "--clean=git" ,
which instructs dgit to use git clean instead of the package's
along with perhaps
.B git reset --hard
before each build.
This is 100% reliable, but has the downside
that if you forget to git add or to commit, and then use
.BR "dgit -wg" " or " "git reset --hard" ,
your changes may be lost.