?RCS: $Id: Csym.U 167 2013-05-08 17:58:00Z rmanfredi $ ?RCS: ?RCS: Copyright (c) 1991-1997, 2004-2006, Raphael Manfredi ?RCS: ?RCS: You may redistribute only under the terms of the Artistic License, ?RCS: as specified in the README file that comes with the distribution. ?RCS: You may reuse parts of this distribution only within the terms of ?RCS: that same Artistic License; a copy of which may be found at the root ?RCS: of the source tree for dist 4.0. ?RCS: ?RCS: $Log: Csym.U,v $ ?RCS: Revision 3.0.1.4 1995/07/25 13:36:29 ram ?RCS: patch56: re-arranged compile line to include ldflags before objects ?RCS: patch56: added quotes for OS/2 support ?RCS: ?RCS: Revision 3.0.1.3 1995/05/12 12:00:33 ram ?RCS: patch54: fixed C test program to bypass gcc builtin type checks (ADO) ?RCS: ?RCS: Revision 3.0.1.2 1994/10/31 09:34:13 ram ?RCS: patch44: added Options to the MAKE line since it's no longer in Init.U ?RCS: ?RCS: Revision 3.0.1.1 1993/08/25 14:00:05 ram ?RCS: patch6: added ldflags as a conditional dependency and to compile line ?RCS: patch6: a final double quote was missing in csym variable after eval ?RCS: ?RCS: Revision 3.0 1993/08/18 12:04:50 ram ?RCS: Baseline for dist 3.0 netwide release. ?RCS: ?MAKE:Csym: Options contains cat libc libs runnm +cc +ccflags +ldflags rm ?MAKE: -pick add $@ %< ?LINT:define csym ?LINT:use libc ?S:csym: ?S: This shell variable is used internally by Configure to check ?S: wether a given C symbol is defined or not. A typical use is: ?S: set symbol result [-fva] [previous] ?S: eval $csym ?S: That will set result to 'true' if the function [-f], variable [-v] ?S: or array [-a] is defined, 'false' otherwise. If a previous value is ?S: given and the -r flag was provided on the command line, that value ?S: is reused without questioning. ?S:. ?V:csym ?T:tval tx tlook tf tdc tc file : is a C symbol defined? csym='tlook=$1; case "$3" in -v) tf=libc.tmp; tc=""; tdc="";; -a) tf=libc.tmp; tc="[0]"; tdc="[]";; *) tlook="^$1\$"; tf=libc.list; tc=""; tdc="()";; esac; file=csym.log; tx=yes; case "$reuseval-$4" in true-) ;; true-*) tx=no; eval "tval=\$$4"; case "$tval" in "") tx=yes;; esac;; esac; case "$tx" in yes) case "$runnm" in true) if $contains $tlook $tf >/dev/null 2>&1; then tval=true; else tval=false; fi;; *) ?X: ?X: We use 'char' instead of 'int' to try to circumvent overzealous ?X: optimizing compilers using built-in prototypes for commonly used ?X: routines to complain when seeing a different external declaration. For ?X: instance, gcc 2.6.3 fails if we use 'int' and we attempt a test against ?X: memcpy() on machines where sizeof(int) == sizeof(char *) (the usual return ?X: type), the compiler assuming it's a built-in declaration given that the ?X: returned size matches. At least with 'char' we are safe! -- RAM, for ADO ?X: ?X: Let's thank GNU cc for making our lives so easy! :-) ?X: (An alternative for the future would be to use our knowledge about gcc ?X: to force a -fno-builtin option in the compile test, in case the 'char' ?X: trick is obsoleted by future gcc releases). -- RAM ?X: ?X: Lastly, gcc 3.4 optimizes &missing == 0 away, so we use + 2 instead now. ?X: The GNU folks like to do weird things, don't they? -- RAM, 2004-06-05 ?X ?X: The above was invalid because main returns an int not a pointer. ?X: Using != or == does not work because GCC complains the pointer will ?X: never be NULL if the function exists. It is a warning meant to prevent ?X: using an address of a function by accident instead of calling it. ?X: However, &missing > 0 is indeed silently optimized away. ?X ?X: FIXME: There must be a test whether non-existing functions are found! ?X: ?X:. -- cbiere, 2011-01-18 ?X: echo "--- $1$tdc ---" >> "$file"; echo "extern char $1$tdc; int main(void) { return (unsigned long) &$1$tc > 2; }" > t.c; $cat t.c >> "$file"; if $cc $ccflags $ldflags -o t t.c $libs >>"$file" 2>&1; then tval=true; else tval=false; fi; $rm -f t t.c;; esac;; *) case "$tval" in $define) tval=true;; *) tval=false;; esac;; esac; echo "==> HAS $1$tdc is $tval ($4)" >>"$file"; eval "$2=$tval"'