1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
This is the root directory for pat tools.
This directory contains an automatic patch generator. You must have RCS
to use this. You must also have run packinit in the top level directory
of your package to create a .package file.
When you've modified a file in your package, the pat program is used to
control the whole process. The other programs can be called by hand, but
usually needn't be. Run pat from the top level directory of your package.
The pat, patcil, patdiff, and patbase programs take a list of filenames as
arguments. Alternately, a -a means all files listed in MANIFEST.
Patcil will create an RCS directory if necessary. However, it may not check in
things which require special initializaton properly. For example, if you
want to check in a shell script, you'd better make your RCS directory yourself
and then say
rcs -i -c'# ' blurfl.xsh
before running pat or patcil. Otherwise the RCS log may not be commented
properly. Unless of course you are using a standard extension (like .c for
a C file) or have placed the proper comments in front of the $Log marker
within the file itself--patcil will then correctly guess the type of
comment required.
Patdiff will create a bugs directory in your top level directory, and will want
to find a patchlevel.h file in that same directory. Everything is done from
that top level directory--don't put any patchlevel.h or bugs directories in
your subdirectories. Each subdirectory has its own RCS directory though.
Patpost, patsend and patftp may be used to post to Usenet, mail to someone,
or copy patches to your ftp directory. They take a destination and a list
of patches to process.
Those pat tools are an hopefully enhanced version of the tools that
came with Larry Wall's dist 2.0. There are however a few new scripts:
- patclean, which checks in the mods and removes the working files.
- patcol, which restores the files removed by a patclean.
- patname, which sets a symbolic version number.
Here is the way I am using the pat tools...
First, I set up a MANIFEST.new file. If you are converting an existing
distribution to use dist, the manifake script will convert a MANIFEST
into a MANIFEST.new (removing the possible archive number column).
Then I run packinit to modify the version number and set up things
correctly. The package is then ready to be placed under pat control.
I make sure the file patchlevel.h is correctly set and I run:
patcil -f -a -s
touch patchlevel.h
find . -name "*~" -exec /bin/rm -f {} \; -print
There is a prototypical patchlevel.h file in this directory, so you
might want to have a look at it.
[If you are planning on using the mailagent to send the patches (and sort
your mail -- that's its primary goal now), the you must make sure
the patchelevel.h file is locatated in the root directory of your package.
The mailagent program is available separately, and was posted on the
comp.sources.misc newsgroup]
Now everything is ready. The distribution is frozen, the bugs directory
has been created. I issue a makedist -v to create the distribution kits.
Eventually I set up the mailagent so that people can request for the
distribution automatically. If I want to create a directory containing
the lattest sources (to be able to `kit' them to someone using the kit
program -- posted to comp.sources.unix), I use:
makedist -c <package>-<version>@<patchlevel>
for instance, for dist 2.9 at PL26
makedist -c dist-2.9@26
which I can then send to people directly with kit (which is NOT part
of this release).
As I receive patches or find some bugs, I edit the files and make the
modifications. When I want to issue an official patch, I run:
pat -n
and one or more patches are issued. You can compress the patches in the
bugs subdirectory, since the mailpatch program knows about that. Also
patindex will correctly uncompress them.
When I need to clean up the distribution directory, I use:
patclean -a
which checks in every changes and removes the working files. The whole
set of working files can then be restored by:
patcol -a
Sometimes, I made a couple of modification and I don't want to issue
a patch right now. I then run:
patcil -a
which checks in the changes. You can run this as many times as you want,
because patcil will skip unchanged file and remembers the last time you
issued a patch.
If you are still using RCS 4.3, be sure you use makedist and not your
own shell archiver, as the $Locker symbol has an annoying expansion
which makes patch to fail when applyed. I'm not sure this was correctly
fixed with RCS 5.5 as I am not using it yet for various reasons.
In any case, if you are using the copyright expansion feature (i.e. the
stuffing of the COPYRIGHT token surrounded by '@' -- can't do it here
or it will get expanded...), then you must use makedist to make sure
the copyright is properly written in all your files. Distributing files
with an un-expanded COPYRIGHT token in them would be a disaster, since
the patching system will also expand them before building a patch and
some of your hunks may not apply correctly.
|
