| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our CODING_STYLE suggests not comparing with NULL, but relying on C's
downgrade-to-bool feature for that. Fix up some code to match these
guidelines. (This is not comprehensive, the coccinelle output for this
is unfortunately kinda borked)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The included cocci was used to generate the changes.
Thanks to @flo-wer for pointing this case out.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In addition to the changes from #6933 this handles cases that could be
matched with the included cocci file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Upstream thinks, that the auto tools are too 'legacy', or that they
are at least no longer fitting.
We follow, as the classic auto tools files have been removed, so no
other choice here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's a common pattern, so add a helper for it. A macro is necessary
because a function that takes a pointer to a pointer would be type specific,
similarly to cleanup functions. Seems better to use a macro.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Super-important change, yeah!
|
|
|
|
| |
The coccinelle patch didn't work in some places, I have no idea why.
|
|
Also add a coccinelle receipt to help with such transitions.
|