| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These lines are generally out-of-date, incomplete and unnecessary. With
SPDX and git repository much more accurate and fine grained information
about licensing and authorship is available, hence let's drop the
per-file copyright notice. Of course, removing copyright lines of others
is problematic, hence this commit only removes my own lines and leaves
all others untouched. It might be nicer if sooner or later those could
go away too, making git the only and accurate source of authorship
information.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This part of the copyright blurb stems from the GPL use recommendations:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html
The concept appears to originate in times where version control was per
file, instead of per tree, and was a way to glue the files together.
Ultimately, we nowadays don't live in that world anymore, and this
information is entirely useless anyway, as people are very welcome to
copy these files into any projects they like, and they shouldn't have to
change bits that are part of our copyright header for that.
hence, let's just get rid of this old cruft, and shorten our codebase a
bit.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Files which are installed as-is (any .service and other unit files, .conf
files, .policy files, etc), are left as is. My assumption is that SPDX
identifiers are not yet that well known, so it's better to retain the
extended header to avoid any doubt.
I also kept any copyright lines. We can probably remove them, but it'd nice to
obtain explicit acks from all involved authors before doing that.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This macro will read a pointer of any type, return it, and set the
pointer to NULL. This is useful as an explicit concept of passing
ownership of a memory area between pointers.
This takes inspiration from Rust:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/option/enum.Option.html#method.take
and was suggested by Alan Jenkins (@sourcejedi).
It drops ~160 lines of code from our codebase, which makes me like it.
Also, I think it clarifies passing of ownership, and thus helps
readability a bit (at least for the initiated who know the new macro)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
../src/basic/extract-word.c:255:22: warning: passing an object that undergoes default argument promotion to 'va_start' has undefined behavior [-Wvarargs]
va_start(ap, flags);
^
../src/basic/extract-word.c:244:77: note: parameter of type 'ExtractFlags' (aka 'enum ExtractFlags') is declared here
int extract_many_words(const char **p, const char *separators, ExtractFlags flags, ...) {
^
../src/basic/extract-word.c:286:22: warning: passing an object that undergoes default argument promotion to 'va_start' has undefined behavior [-Wvarargs]
va_start(ap, flags);
^
../src/basic/extract-word.c:244:77: note: parameter of type 'ExtractFlags' (aka 'enum ExtractFlags') is declared here
int extract_many_words(const char **p, const char *separators, ExtractFlags flags, ...) {
^
2 warnings generated.
I think the relevant part of C99 is 6.7.2.2 Enumeration specifiers:
Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char, a signed integer type, or
an unsigned integer type. The choice of type is implementation-defined, but
shall be capable of representing the values of all the members of the
enumeration.
and 7.16.1.4:
The parameter parmN is the identifier of the rightmost parameter in the
variable parameter list in the function definition (the one just before the
...). If the parameter parmN is declared with the register storage class, with
a function or array type, or with a type that is not compatible with the type
that results after application of the default argument promotions, the behavior
is undefined.
This might cause a real issue if the compiler chooses something that is not an
integer for ExtractFlags. Rework the code to avoid the warning, but add an
assert_cc in a large-valued ExtractFlags element is ever defined and the type
is bumped to something wider than an int.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our warning message was misleading, because we wouldn't "correct" anything,
we'd just ignore unkown escapes. Update the message.
Also, print just the extracted word (which contains the offending sequences) in
the message, instead of the whole line.
Fixes #4697.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
extract_first_words deals fine with the string being NULL, so drop the upfront
check for that.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Throughout the tree there's spurious use of spaces separating ++ and --
operators from their respective operands. Make ++ and -- operator
consistent with the majority of existing uses; discard the spaces.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not every byte sequence is valid utf8. We allow escaping of non-utf8
sequences in strings by using octal and hexadecimal escape sequences
(\123 and \0xAB) for bytes at or above 128. Users of cunescape_one
could infer whether such use occured when they received an answer
between 128 and 256 in *ret (a non-ascii one byte character). But this
is subtle and misleading: the comments were wrong, because ascii is a
subset of unicode, so c != 0 did not mean non-unicode, but rather
ascii-subset-of-unicode-or-raw-byte. This was all rather confusing, so
make the "single byte" condition explicit.
I'm not convinced that allowing non-utf8 sequences to be produced is
useful in all cases where we allow it (e.g. in config files), but that
behaviour is unchanged, just made more explicit.
This also fixes an (invalid) gcc warning about unitialized variable
(*ret_unicode) in callers of cunescape_one.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Although having a two line mask like
/// UNNEEDED by elogind
#if 0
it is much more easier to read (and patch!) if those two lines were
condense into a one-line mask start like
#if 0 /// UNNEEDED by elogind
|
|
|
The util.[hc] files have been stripped of a lot of functions, that
got sorted into various new files representing the type of
utility.
This commit adds the missing files.
|
