diff options
| author | Will Estes <wlestes@users.sourceforge.net> | 2001-08-16 18:19:05 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Will Estes <wlestes@users.sourceforge.net> | 2001-08-16 18:19:05 +0000 |
| commit | 3b393bb68b51cc7bc8dbe8209e6d79f23c364444 (patch) | |
| tree | d2045f56cf739ed40bade95a7eecd489bc76090c /to.do | |
| parent | eba55a9af0296fe5945dd85c18f91c2e2a331515 (diff) | |
more mail
Diffstat (limited to 'to.do')
| -rw-r--r-- | to.do/flex.rmail | 78 |
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/to.do/flex.rmail b/to.do/flex.rmail index e31700d..6c7f445 100644 --- a/to.do/flex.rmail +++ b/to.do/flex.rmail @@ -4439,4 +4439,82 @@ flex maintenance and development. + +1,, +X-Coding-System: nil +Mail-from: From johnmillaway@yahoo.com Thu Aug 16 11:11:13 2001 +Return-Path: <johnmillaway@yahoo.com> +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by michael.uncg.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22070 + for <wlestes@localhost>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:11:13 -0400 +Received: from imap.uncg.edu + by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.1.0) + for wlestes@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:11:13 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from external-gw.uncg.edu (external-gw.uncg.edu [152.13.2.70]) + by hermes.uncg.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7GF5xW19868 + for <wlestes@hermes.email.uncg.edu>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:05:59 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from web9405.mail.yahoo.com (web9405.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.111]) + by external-gw.uncg.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA07077 + for <wlestes@uncg.edu>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:05:57 -0400 (EDT) +Message-ID: <20010816150558.37014.qmail@web9405.mail.yahoo.com> +Received: from [216.254.82.102] by web9405.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:05:58 PDT +Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT) +From: "John W. Millaway" <johnmillaway@yahoo.com> +Subject: Re: comments in lexical definitions +To: Tobias Ostgathe <ostgathe@tesionmail.de> +Cc: help-flex@gnu.org, Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de>, + "W. L. Estes" <wlestes@uncg.edu> +In-Reply-To: <003301c1264e$0677bea0$2465e2c3@wuschtbix> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii + +*** EOOH *** +Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT) +From: "John W. Millaway" <johnmillaway@yahoo.com> +Subject: Re: comments in lexical definitions +To: Tobias Ostgathe <ostgathe@tesionmail.de> +Cc: help-flex@gnu.org, Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker@physik.rwth-aachen.de>, + "W. L. Estes" <wlestes@uncg.edu> +In-Reply-To: <003301c1264e$0677bea0$2465e2c3@wuschtbix> + +> > > I'm missing the possibility to include comments in lexical definition + +Flex does allow comments everywhere you could possibly need them. This +discussion suggests a failure in the flex docs to make the syntax clear. What's +the trick, then? + +1. Use traditional C comments, not '//' comments. +2. INDENT THE COMMENT. + +-John +(Exhaustive example follows) + +%{ + /* 1 */ +%} + /* 2 */ +%option reentrant +%x STATE_X + +%% + /* 3 */ +ruleA /* 4 */ { /* 5 */} +ruleB /* 6 */ ECHO; /* 7 */ + /* 8 */ +<STATE_X>{ +ruleC ECHO; + /* 9 */ +ruleD ECHO; +} + +%% +/* 10 */ + + + +__________________________________________________ +Do You Yahoo!? +Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger +http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ +
\ No newline at end of file |