diff options
| author | madduck <madduck@3cfab66f-1918-0410-86b3-c06b76f9a464> | 2006-11-17 19:18:43 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | madduck <madduck@3cfab66f-1918-0410-86b3-c06b76f9a464> | 2006-11-17 19:18:43 +0000 |
| commit | 6a2103414bfd42dedd9c943ad1ffb6719cc45aa1 (patch) | |
| tree | 92be3986021f69e71b3917f1282c9fbc5f62c17d /debian/FAQ | |
| parent | b40f7f5065a004d58377aeb5430dc58510c058a0 (diff) | |
typo
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/FAQ')
| -rw-r--r-- | debian/FAQ | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ The latest version of this FAQ is available here: At the same time, however, RAID4/5/6 provide somewhat better redundancy in the event of two failing disks. In a RAID10 configuration, if one disk is already dead, the RAID can only survive if any of the two disks in the other - RAID1 array fails, but not if the second disk in the degraded RADI1 array + RAID1 array fails, but not if the second disk in the degraded RAID1 array fails (see next item, 4b). A RAID6 across four disks can cope with any two disks failing. However, RAID6 is noticeably slower than RAID5. RAID5 and RAID4 do not differ much, but can only handle single-disk failures. |