| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Linear arrays don't respond to setting raid-disks, only to
adding a device.
Reported-by: mulhern
Reported-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122146
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the request --size to --grow an array to is 32bits
(i.e. msb in bit 32) then mdadm make wrong choice and
uses ioctl instead of setting component_size via sysfs
and the change is ignored.
This is fixed by using correct casts.
Reported-and-tested-by: Killian De Volder <killian.de.volder@megasoft.be>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Grow process did not check if reshape is already started
when deciding about restarting.
Sync_action should be checked in this case, and if
reshape is running - restart flag should not be set.
Otherwise, Grow process will fail to write data to
sysfs, and reshape will not be continued.
Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 18d9bcfa33939cee345d4d7735bc6081bcc409c8
removed wrong line (in case RAID0->RAID4).
This patch corrects this mistake
(line should be removed in case RAID4->RAID4).
Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mdadm should not run 'grow-continue' unit file for container if
'--freeze-reshape' argument is passed. Otherwise it will be ignored,
and reshape will start anyway.
Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to commit 06e293d0970e36b1ed049b9d3ccb21a870e9d2eb
same thing should be done for reshape_container in Grow_continue
Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit fdcad551e9a54c4aa8c4b63160b76e2c539a0441
brings some changes to reshape process.
Setting 'before.layout' when reshaping from RAID4 to another RAID4 is
not really necessary.
If reshape is restarted 'before.layout' will be compared with
'info->array.layout' in reshape_array(). Changes brought by mentioned
commit will cause this comparation return as false, becouse 'array.layout'
is always set to 'ALGORITHM_PARITY_N' in analyse_change() for RAID4, so
reshape will not be continued after reboot/stop.
This patch reverts unnecessary changes.
Signed-off-by: Pawel Baldysiak pawel.baldysiak@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Proper implementations have offsetof in stddef.h
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 5e76dce1acd906e8fc8af04973c3a129cdc77fd6 changed
Grow_continue to assume a fork had already happened, so that
mdadm --grow --continue
didn't fork. This is good, but it means that if Grow_continue
is run from Assemble, then
mdadm --assemble ....
can misbehave if the array was in the middle of a reshape.
So introduce finer control. Grow_continue only assumes it has
already forked if run from "mdadm --grow --continue".
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows it to be used for containers too.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a better match for reshape_array() and means that
"mdadm --grow --continue" will run in the foreground, which
makes more sense.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If "--assemble" or "--incremental" is started by udev, then
monitoring the reshape in the background won't work.
So try asking systemd to start a grow-continue.
If that fails, just do it the old way.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subsequent patch will allow the background part of "mdadm --grow" to
be run from systemd. This can require the passing of a backup file
name.
To do this, store that name as a symlink in /run/mdadm (or MAP_DIR)
and look for it when appropriate.
It might be useful to also store the name across reboot, but that
would be a different patch. We would need to use the uuid to identify
it, and store it in stable storage.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1/ when unfreezing, make sure the array is frozen first.
If it isn't we might end up interrupting a reshape.
2/ When the child finishes, don't call abort_reshape() as that
will interrupt the reshape. Just set suspend_* etc
explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(and various cosmetic fixes)
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since:
commit 84d11e6c6a3b827b2daa32e16303235ce33d49f5
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Thu Aug 1 11:16:14 2013 +1000
Grow: exit background thread cleanly on SIGTERM.
removed the setting of "sync_max" from abort_reshape() we need
to do it explicitly here.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the mdadm thread that monitors a reshape gets SIGTERM it should
exit cleanly and clear the 'suspended' region of the array.
However it mustn't clear 'sync_max' as that would allow the
reshape to continue unmonitored.
If the thread ever does get killed, the array should really be
shutdown soon after if possible.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Coverity discovered a possible double close(fd2) in Grow.c. Avoided by
invalidating fd2 after the first close.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we will need to change array level when a reshape completes, a copy
of mdadm waits in the background.
Currently this copy hold the device (/dev/mdX) open. This prevents
the array from being stopped.
So close the file descriptor and re-open after the reshape completes.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'0' means 'make it 0', which isn't what we want here.
We want 'leave it unchanged'.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Having a fix time for a wait is clumsy and can make us
wait much too long.
So use mdstat_wait and keep the mdstat_fd open.
This requires an 'mdstat_close' so it doesn't stay open
forever.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
--stop now tries to wait for a reshape to be at just the right spot.
However for a reducing reshape, mdadm will be running in the
background watching, and might adjust sync_max and mess things up.
So teach "progress_reshape" to notice when "sync_max" is modified, and
leave it alone.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
progress_reshape() may not set reshape_completed if the reshape is
interrupted, so we need to initialize it to the current value before
hand, so the value used afterwards is credible.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the restarted reshape needs a backup file and we don't have one,
that should be reported before we try to start the array.
Also we shouldn't say the "Cannot grow" but "cannot complete".
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To be able to revert-reshape of raid4/5/6 which is changing
the number of devices, the reshape must has been stopped on a multiple
of the old and new stripe sizes.
The kernel only enforces the new stripe size multiple.
So we enforce the old-stripe-size multiple by careful use of
"sync_max" and monitoring "reshape_position".
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have several places that wait for activity on a sysfs
file. Combine most of these into a single 'sysfs_wait' function.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After the 'started' label it is assumed that 'sra' is set, so better
set it when jumping there.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For RAID10, we must have head/tail space for reshape.
For RAID4/5/6 we can use a spare or a backup file.
So make that distinction.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When changing the chunksize of an array, the new chunksize must
divide the device size.
If it doesn't we report a very brief message.
Make this message a bit longer and suggest a way forward be reducing
the size of the array.
Reported-by: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we don't do this explicitly, we end up keeping the "current"
layout, which is meaningless for RAID0.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are now 3 places which change level.
And they all do it slightly differently with different
messages etc.
Make a single function for this and use it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When converting to RAID0, all spares and non-data drives
need to be removed first.
It is possible that the first HOT_REMOVE_DISK will fail because the
personality hasn't let go of it yet, so retry a few times.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After changing the level, the meaning of layout numbers changes,
so we will keeping a new_layout value around can cause later confusion.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This means it will be set for a "--data-offset" only reshape so that
case doesn't complain that the array is getting smaller.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1/ ignore failed devices - obviously
2/ We need to tell the kernel which direction the reshape should
progress even if we didn't choose the particular data_offset
to use.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Setting new_offset can fail if the v1.x "data_size" is too small.
So if that happens, try increasing it first by writing "0".
That can fail on spare devices due to a kernel bug, so if it doesn't
try writing the correct number of sectors.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we choose a new data-offset, make sure it is rounded to a largest
power of to possible, up to 1Meg
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It should always be tested against INVALID_SECTORS!!!
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that I am using white-space mode in Emacs I can see all of this,
and I don't like it :-)
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The second 'info2' wasn't being initialised. So don't use it.
Reported by -O3
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some people want to create truely enormous arrays.
As we sometimes need to hold one file descriptor for each
device, this can hit the NOFILE limit.
So raise the limit if it ever looks like it might be a problem.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the reshape does not require a backup, Grow_continue can
abort early.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is possible that the devices in an array have different sizes, and
different data_offsets. So the 'before_space' and 'after_space' may
be different from drive to drive.
Any decisions about how much to change the data_offset must work on
all devices, so must be based on the minimum available space on
any devices.
So find this minimum first, then do the calculation.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
| |
This will cause a reshape to start going backwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes, that is all we want to do.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In that case the problem is almost certainly that --data-offset is too big.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So report if both are given, and if --backup-file is given,
don't try to update data-offset.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If new_offset change is too big, just do the reshape the old way.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
|