summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/man/pam_conv.3
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/man/pam_conv.3')
-rw-r--r--doc/man/pam_conv.38
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/man/pam_conv.3 b/doc/man/pam_conv.3
index 568fabda..181604e2 100644
--- a/doc/man/pam_conv.3
+++ b/doc/man/pam_conv.3
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
'\" t
.\" Title: pam_conv
.\" Author: [FIXME: author] [see http://docbook.sf.net/el/author]
-.\" Generator: DocBook XSL Stylesheets v1.78.1 <http://docbook.sf.net/>
-.\" Date: 05/18/2017
+.\" Generator: DocBook XSL Stylesheets v1.79.1 <http://docbook.sf.net/>
+.\" Date: 06/08/2020
.\" Manual: Linux-PAM Manual
.\" Source: Linux-PAM Manual
.\" Language: English
.\"
-.TH "PAM_CONV" "3" "05/18/2017" "Linux-PAM Manual" "Linux-PAM Manual"
+.TH "PAM_CONV" "3" "06/08/2020" "Linux-PAM Manual" "Linux-PAM Manual"
.\" -----------------------------------------------------------------
.\" * Define some portability stuff
.\" -----------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Display some text\&.
.PP
The point of having an array of messages is that it becomes possible to pass a number of things to the application in a single call from the module\&. It can also be convenient for the application that related things come at once: a windows based application can then present a single form with many messages/prompts on at once\&.
.PP
-In passing, it is worth noting that there is a descrepency between the way Linux\-PAM handles the const struct pam_message **msg conversation function argument from the way that Solaris\*(Aq PAM (and derivitives, known to include HP/UX, are there others?) does\&. Linux\-PAM interprets the msg argument as entirely equivalent to the following prototype const struct pam_message *msg[] (which, in spirit, is consistent with the commonly used prototypes for argv argument to the familiar main() function: char **argv; and char *argv[])\&. Said another way Linux\-PAM interprets the msg argument as a pointer to an array of num_msg read only \*(Aqstruct pam_message\*(Aq pointers\&. Solaris\*(Aq PAM implementation interprets this argument as a pointer to a pointer to an array of num_msg pam_message structures\&. Fortunately, perhaps, for most module/application developers when num_msg has a value of one these two definitions are entirely equivalent\&. Unfortunately, casually raising this number to two has led to unanticipated compatibility problems\&.
+In passing, it is worth noting that there is a discrepancy between the way Linux\-PAM handles the const struct pam_message **msg conversation function argument and the way that Solaris\*(Aq PAM (and derivatives, known to include HP/UX, are there others?) does\&. Linux\-PAM interprets the msg argument as entirely equivalent to the following prototype const struct pam_message *msg[] (which, in spirit, is consistent with the commonly used prototypes for argv argument to the familiar main() function: char **argv; and char *argv[])\&. Said another way Linux\-PAM interprets the msg argument as a pointer to an array of num_msg read only \*(Aqstruct pam_message\*(Aq pointers\&. Solaris\*(Aq PAM implementation interprets this argument as a pointer to a pointer to an array of num_msg pam_message structures\&. Fortunately, perhaps, for most module/application developers when num_msg has a value of one these two definitions are entirely equivalent\&. Unfortunately, casually raising this number to two has led to unanticipated compatibility problems\&.
.PP
For what its worth the two known module writer work\-arounds for trying to maintain source level compatibility with both PAM implementations are:
.sp