| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
even if the `latex_macros` extension is set.
This reverts to earlier behavior and is probably safer
on the whole, since some macros only modify things in
included packages, which pandoc's macro expansion can't
modify.
Closes #4246.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't pass through macro definitions themselves when `latex_macros`
is set. The macros have already been applied.
If `latex_macros` is enabled, then `rawLaTeXBlock` in
Text.Pandoc.Readers.LaTeX will succeed in parsing a macro definition,
and will update pandoc's internal macro map accordingly, but the
empty string will be returned.
Together with earlier changes, this closes #4179.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that we still don't support macros with fancy parameter
delimiters, like
\def\foo#1..#2{...}
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also, fix regular macros so they're expanded at the
point of use, and NOT also the point of definition.
`\let` macros, by contrast, are expanded at the
point of definition. Added an `ExpansionPoint`
field to `Macro` to track this difference.
|
| | |
|
|
|
Fixed applyMacros so that it operates on the whole
string, not just the first token!
Don't remove macro definitions from the output,
even if Ext_latex_macros is set, so that macros will
be applied. Since they're only applied to math in
Markdown, removing the macros can have bad effects.
Even for math macros, keeping them should be harmless.
|
