diff options
author | martin f. krafft <madduck@madduck.net> | 2008-10-15 10:13:31 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | martin f. krafft <madduck@madduck.net> | 2008-10-15 10:14:46 +0200 |
commit | af0211656de316e615b5c23ddfeeaa1393ee7a04 (patch) | |
tree | 60661b86c66eedb5a17491d43f5748b776ffdf8d /debian | |
parent | f1c8ab92a328a2f4545a6ddcf11615f2771edc6d (diff) | |
parent | b8fab3955776b1d2d948a24351e726fc11ac5d13 (diff) |
Merge branch 'deb/docs' and record in changelog
Diffstat (limited to 'debian')
-rw-r--r-- | debian/FAQ | 11 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | debian/changelog | 3 |
2 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ The latest version of this FAQ is available here: I am assuming that you are talking about a setup with two copies of each block, so --layout=near2/far2/offset2: - In half of the cases, yes [0], and it does not matter which layout you use. - When you assemble 4 disks into a RAID10, you essentially stripe a RAID0 + In two thirds of the cases, yes[0], and it does not matter which layout you + use. When you assemble 4 disks into a RAID10, you essentially stripe a RAID0 across two RAID1, so the four disks A,B,C,D become two pairs: A,B and C,D. If A fails, the RAID6 can only survive if the second failing disk is either C or D; If B fails, your array is dead. @@ -151,8 +151,11 @@ The latest version of this FAQ is available here: See also question 18 further down. - 0. it's actually 1/(n-1), where n is the number of disks. I am not - a mathematician, see http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/ + 0. it's actually (n-2)/(n-1), where n is the number of disks. I am not + a mathematician, see http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/, which gives the + chance of *failure* as 1/(n-1), so the chance of success is 1-1/(n-1), or + (n-2)/(n-1), or 2/3 in the four disk example. + (Thanks to Per Olofsson for clarifying this in #493577). 5. How to convert RAID5 to RAID10? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index ff9ca844..2b113dd5 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ mdadm (2.6.7-4) unstable; urgency=low (/usr/share/doc/mdadm/examples/newdisk.gz) (closes: #490955). * Add link to Warren Togami's writeup about remote RAID-1 conversion to README.recipes. + * Fix probability of survival in FAQ 4b, since I erroneously labeled the + chance of failure as the chance of survival; thanks to Per Olofssen for + clarification (closes: #493577). -- martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:12:28 +0200 |